rss

The Internal Power Training Blog

Check out the latest info and research from Coach Chris' explorations in the Subject of Internal Power.

Exploring every avenue ... Bookmark

In a step away from the mechanics of internal power, this post will deal with a subject that I come up against time and again in the internal arts community. A subject hotly debated but rarely agreed upon. The subject of ‘chi’.

 

More specifically I would like to address my apparent rejection of ‘Chi’ as a useful term in my writings and teachings.

 

It would be fair to say that for many years, the idea of Chi and the use of the term was a part of my practice. I had some teachers who would use the term regularly to describe feelings experienced during practice or to explain how they were able to create certain effects in a partner. So why do I so rarely use it now in my teachings or practice?

Firstly, some of the most influential teachers I have met did not use the term regularly. They could do everything that those who did use the term could do but they would explain everything in precise terms. They would talk of tissue, nerves, mass, direction and acceleration rather that this ‘chi’ or that ‘chi’.

 

This influence and my naturally probing mind led me to look into the possible explanations for the effects that I had experienced throughout my years of training. Needless to say I was to discover that absolutely no effect experienced in solo training or via the hands of a master required the concept of ‘chi’ to be understood.  The tingling hands, the ‘feeling of something flowing’, the light touch producing huge effects ... all of these things could be explained with the right research, often laterally into disciplines not related to the internal arts. This became the focus of my writings and teachings.

 

Secondly, for anyone that has discussed the subject of ‘Chi’ on the internet you will hear a great and varied series of opinions on what it is. Everyone is SURE that they know the answer but no one can agree. Some of the definitions that commonly crop up are:

 

-          Undiscovered type of energy

-          Electromagnetism

-          Breath

-          Potential and Kinetic energy

-          Bio electricity

-          The list is long and expansive

 

So with this great variability and the problems associated with the variety of interpretations, the term quickly loses its usefulness in discussions on the Internal Arts.  As with anything, for a discussion or lesson to be truly useful, we need to agree on the definition. This agreement is always lacking when the word ‘chi’ is used to describe a phenomena.

 

Lastly, it is extremely common for viewers or readers to be turned off the subject as a whole, if the article doesn’t use Chi in accordance with their personal definition.  This means that they can miss the really useful information that is out there and being explored by a few of us, simply because the use of a single term didn’t fit with their personal dogma. I hope that by avoiding the term in most cases, the readers will always find something useful in my writings.

 

So in conclusion, it is certainly not that I reject the idea of ‘chi’ in its various definitions, even though it may seem this way. As any good researcher and practitioner should be, I remain completely open minded. However, when trying to explore the intricacies of the Internal Arts and their utility in general, it will remain my last point of call in explanation, especially when other explanations help the community at large to a far greater degree. I will always explore every avenue before turning to the esoteric.

 

Happy training all. 



Comments are closed.

HeavyBody
Foundations course
is now LIVE!


  Click here for more info

Authors

Featured

  • Something exciting is Launching today in the IPT Academy!  Articled 4 years ago
     
  • Addressing lower crossed Syndrome Articled 4 years ago
    The lower crossed syndrome is something that we see to a lesser or greater degree in new students. The lower cross is a term used to describe a specific pattern of muscular imbalance in the lower body which results in pelvic tilting and curvature of the lower back. If left unchecked, internal strength training where we are specifically working on the connective tissues and muscles in this area can actually compound postural problems, as well as increase the likelihood of injury under load. The lower Cross is characterized by a combination of both weakness and tightness in the lower torso. Specifically, tightness in the Thoraco lumbar extensors which is reflected in the hip flexors and weakness in the abdominals reflected in the Gluteals. This specific pattern of imbalance creates joint dysfunction at specific points along the lower spine and will cause the pelvis to tilt forward. Internal arts have specific training methodologies to address this issue. The corrections are achieved through 'releasing' the tightness in the thoracolumbar and hip flexors. We are aiming to bring the lower cross into a relaxed ...